Despite the branching paths, all roads in Assassin's Creed Odyssey lead to one finale.īoth games offer different variations of branching paths and neither is better than the other. The way you treat characters and what state Geralt is left in determines whether you get 1 of 3 endings. However, unlike Assassin's Creed Odyssey The Witcher 3 is tracking everything. With acts ending with critical choices that alter the game. The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt does have its mix of immediate and long-term consequences. For example, publicly killing a target may yield immediate results in the way of different dialogue but later on, it becomes apparent that only one option exists for another critical character because of that action, hours from that choice.
In Assassin's Creed Odyssey these consequences manifest in less subtle ways. Decisions have ripple effects that can lead to unforeseen consequences, whether minor or major, the consequences of your choices eventually show themselves in one way or another. One of the most appealing mechanics in both Assassin's Creed Odyssey and The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is the branching story. However, how does it hold up when compared to CD Projekt RED's The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt? A game that is known for delivering one of the best experiences this generation.
Many are praising the latest game's open world and branching story, a first for the series, while also complementing the refined naval and melee combat.
Assassin's Creed Odysseyrecently launched to a lot of positive reviews.
0 kommentar(er)
